Notable Cases

A selection of notable cases that Lipman Karas has litigated over the last decade.


Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Ltd v Lee [2014] HKCFA 63

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal

In an action for breach of fiduciary duty by a company director, this decision analyses the circumstances in which (a) the introduction of a new claim after the expiry of the six year limitation period for bringing an action will be permitted; and (b) a company has a right of action against a director in respect of the payment of a valid debt of the company, when insolvent or near insolvent.

Re China Medical Technologies Inc [2014] 2 HKLRD 997;
and [2014] 5 HKC 152; and [2014] HKCFI 1563

High Court of Hong Kong SAR

These decisions analyse (a) the criteria for winding up a foreign company in Hong Kong where there are no creditors in the jurisdiction; (b) the applicable principles for reopening a winding up petition to adduce fresh evidence; and (c) the Hong Kong Court’s common law jurisdiction to assist a foreign liquidator.

Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2014] 17 HKCFAR 218

High Court of Hong Kong SAR

This decision analyses the circumstances in which tax assessments will be reopened under the Inland Revenue Ordinance where the taxpayer company is the victim of fraud involving false accounting through the creation of false profits, including detailed examination of the principles of corporate attribution in fraud cases and under statute.

Carlyle Capital Corporation Ltd v Conway and Ors [2013] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 179

Guernsey Court of Appeal

This decision analyses (a) the applicable principles for granting an anti-anti-suit injunction; and (b) the circumstances in which an exclusive jurisdiction clause will be displaced to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, inconsistent judgments and evasion of important public policies.

Mir Steel UK Ltd v Morris [2013] 2 All ER 54

English Court of Appeal

This decision analysed the circumstances in which an administrator may be liable for inducing a breach of contract for dealing with property to which there was a dispute as to title.

Westpac Banking Corporation v Bell Group Ltd (No 3) [2012] 44 WAR 1

Western Australian Court of Appeal

This decision contains an examination of the applicable legal principles on numerous company law topics, including contractual subordination of corporate bonds, voidable transactions, equitable fraud in the context of provision of security to banks, the fiduciary duties of company directors, knowing receipt of property to which fiduciary obligations attach and remedies for equitable compensation by way of injunction.

Elders Rural v Registrar of Plant Breeder’s Rights [2012] 199 FCR 520

Full Federal Court of Australia

Construction of transitional legislation to recognise an intellectual property right as having been granted under newly enacted legislation, resulting in recognition of the applicant’s rights for a longer duration and a mandatory injunction against the Commonwealth to give effect to those rights.

Kasikornbank Bank v Akai Holdings Ltd [2010] 13 HKCFAR 479

High Court of Hong Kong SAR

This decision analyses (a) the test for whether a third party justifiably relied on apparent authority of a company’s agent by reference to “irrationality”; (b) the different basis for assessing equitable compensation from common law damages; and; (c) the requisite state of mind for knowing receipt of trust property by reference to “unconscionability” on the part of the recipient.

Borrelli v Ting [2010] Bus LR 1718

UK Privy Council (on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda)

This decision establishes that (a) “sharp practice” in respect of a business transaction may amount to unconscionability; and (b) in appropriate cases, such unconscionability can give rise to “economic duress” even in a commercial context.

Akai Holdings Ltd v Ho Wing On and Grande Holdings Ltd [2009] HKCFI 74; [2009] HKCA 890

High Court and Court of Appeal of Hong Kong SAR

The largest asset freezing order (US$200m) made in Hong Kong against an individual and successful Court of Appeal litigation to appoint receivers over international assets in support of freezing order. This was the first time receivers were appointed in Hong Kong in aid of an asset freezing order.

ITC Ltd v Timbercorp Ltd (in liq) (2009) 76 ACSR 467; [2010] 242 FLR 360

Supreme Court of South Australia

Upholding the exercise of an option to purchase shares in a joint venture vehicle consequent on a default by the option holder’s joint venture partner entering administration. Option enforced against receivers and subsequent liquidator of the insolvent joint venture partner.

Akai Holdings Ltd v Ernst & Young [2009] 12 HKCFAR 649

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal

This decision analyses the circumstances in which records of interviews and private examinations by liquidators are covered by litigation privilege and the Court’s supervisory jurisdiction over such records.

Re JN Taylor Holdings Ltd (in liq) [2007] 62 ACSR 695

Supreme Court of South Australia

This decision analyses (a) the court’s power to sit in camera and to preserve the confidentiality of confidential documents; and (b) the circumstances in which the court will order a private hearing, where to sit in public would destroy the subject matter of the dispute.

Kong Wah Holdings Ltd v Grande Holdings Ltd [2006] 9 HKCFAR 766

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal

This decision analyses the nature and scope of the court’s jurisdiction under section 221 of the Companies Ordinance to require production of documents and information by persons involved in the affairs of insolvent companies.

Elders Ltd v Incitec Pivot Ltd [2006] SASC 99

Supreme Court of South Australia

In an action over a supply contract termination clause if the parties were unable to agree on trading terms, this decision analyses the contractual principles for valid termination, repudiation, anticipatory breach, incapacity and whether a requirement of good faith is to be implied.


Lipman Karas Pty Ltd
Level 23
25 Grenfell Street
Adelaide 5000
Visit us | Email us
Telephone: +61 8 8239 4600

Hong Kong

Lipman Karas
Level 23
Three Pacific Place
1 Queen's Road East
Hong Kong
Visit us | Email us
Telephone: +852 3761 3900


Lipman Karas LLP
Holborn Gate
26 Southampton Buildings
London WC2A 1AN
United Kingdom
Visit us | Email us
Telephone: +44 20 7400 2180
Back to top